Tuesday, February 9, 2010
 

How Old Media Can Get Back in the Game

I write for a local newspaper, 24hrs, and a local magazine, Vancouver View.

The odd thing is, I don’t really read newspapers or magazines, I get most of what I need to know from the web.

Now that model doesn’t work for everyone, I get that, so I believe there is a place for print in our world – but that place is getting smaller.

SOME WORK, MOST DON’T

Free dailies, like 24hrs, are brilliant. They are tightly packaged commuter papers. You get the headlines, some features and basically just enough information to be able to read the whole thing cover to cover before you get to your stop.

It’s the big newspapers that are feeling the pinch. In the US, newsrooms are laying off staff as circulations shrink and revenues plummet. Craigslist’s free service is sucking the revenue out of the Classifieds, while the web is getting people their information as it happens, not a day or two later.

But there is a way for big daily newspapers to become relevant again. They have the staff, they have the resources, they have the content – they’re just not using it properly.

TELL ME WHAT YOU KNOW WHEN YOU KNOW IT

Why wait until the next morning to publish your columnist’s insight on a big breaking political scandal or hockey trade? If it broke at 4p, we’re going to see it on that night’s news, hear it on the radio when we wake up and THEN read about it in the paper? The newspaper is 3rd in line. I’m over it by the time I get to you, there’s little new insight to be offered. BUT, if the paper would have published that news, as it happened, I would have caught it in my RSS reader and they would have been 1st in line, not 3rd.

For the older generation who can’t grab RSS feeds, and the web’s ability to spread news now, they can still get their paper the next morning. It becomes a “Best of” the website.

By having an instant online presence, and a morning paper, you’re effectively building a bridge between generations. Your brand now becomes valuable to those who look to the web for news. Newspaper newsrooms have a reliable, responsible and professional staff. Their writing is much more accurate and accountable than that which I read on blogs, but guess who gets to me first?

DONT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT

Randy Michaels gets it.

This is how Newspapers can OWN the local, online video space: simply equip their journalists and production staff with mobile devices like these…..then get them out from behind their desks, and into the field…..pronto! [source]

Jeff Jarvis gets it too.

For today, a wired journalist without a camera and connectivity is like a hack without a pencil. [source]

The grand old dame of print gets it. The NYT abolished their online subscription model and opened up all their content for free.

In reaching 17.5 million uniques, the paper had its best month ever… Vivian Schiller, Senior VP and General Manager of the NYTimes.com attributes a significant part of the increase to the end of the subscription model called Times Select. Fueling the growth, she also cites popular multimedia features, blogs and a successful search maximization strategy. [source]

Video for a newspaper? Yup. They are a content provider now, not a newspaper. Instead of becoming nothing more than a 10lb Sunday paperweight, The New York Times has successfully placed a pillar of support in both the new media and old media worlds.

24hrs in Vancouver also successfully uses a multimedia approach. Articles often have mentions of web addresses where video and audio additions to the story can be found. The site also features it’s own quirky podcast courtesy of Guts MacTavish.

THEY’RE TRYING

Local newspaper, the Province is trying, but their The Newsroom feature is not what it could be. It’s infrequently updated and doesnt really offer anything of substance. Same with their Live @ Five feature which has been placed on hiatus for re-tooling. It was an editorial slap at the headlines of the day, but came off a little too flip and sarcastic to be taken seriously. Now they’re trying, I’ll give them that, but they don’t really “get it” – yet.

Radio is already starting to move in the right directions. News/talk radio stations are publishing texts of their newscasts, so even if I’m not listening to the radio, I can get the information I need – and the brand is reinforced as a reliable news source.

I use the web as an aggregator for all the bits I mention on air. Miss my show? No problem, look up my show notes and you’ll get all the pop culturology you can handle. My brand, and the radio station’s brand, is reinforced as a place to go to get “it.”

As it stands now, big daily newspapers are nothing but a rehash of wire stories I read online 2 days ago – but things could be different with a little forward thinking.

The Blog According to Buzz. Spread the word, ya heard?

Like this post? Pass it on...
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
 

Tags: , ,

  • Totally agree Buzz. When the newspapers call asking if I want a subscription, I tell them two things - I get my news from the internet and newspapers are a waste of trees. The important commodity that newspapers have to offer (as you mention) is their accountability as a trustworthy news source. Even though I get my information from the web, I don't always trust it. The newspapers are't capitalizing on their skills as reporters and writers by putting reliable information on the web quickly. If I really want trusted news information, I go to Reuters.com (via my Yahoo home page), but I'd be just as happy going local if they got me the information fast enough.

    Thanks for the food for thought Buzz. Happy blue sky day!
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Buzz Bishop

Dad. Broadcaster. Writer.
New Media Evangelist.

Need more than 6 words? Check out the Media Kit.

Copyright

Creative Commons License
Copyright 2009 cyberbuzz media.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NC-SA 2.5 Canada License.