Tuesday, February 9, 2010
 

How Many Megapixels Do You Need?

I recently chatted with Dan Kesselring from Panasonic to get some tips on how to buy a digital camera for my column in 24hrs.

Megapixel is where a lot of people get confused. It simply refers to the dots in the image.

If you have a 7 megapixel camera vs one with 10, you’re really only going to see the difference if you’re using the camera to make very large prints, say beyond 19×13. Dan says really 5 megapixels is enough for most of us who are just printing 4×6 or archiving family memories

When it comes to specific features, “image stabilization should always be top of mind,” says Kesselring. “Its almost become a generic term, but there are different types and optical is providing the best form of stabilization.” [link]

A test done by a German company is now coming out with similar information. More megapixels does not equal more better.

The study actually finds that picture quality over the last 3 years has actually decreased as megapixels have increased.

But why? Well, compact cameras are supposed to be small and reasonably priced. Therefore small image sensors, e.g. format 7.5 x 9.4 mm or 5.4 x 6.8 mm, are built into the cameras. To increase the pixel count, the sensor has to be divided into smaller and smaller pixels.

The result is a decrease in sensitivity of the camera and an increase in noise because the amount of light collected by a single pixel is smaller. [link]

So as the CCD sensors have to stay small for the point and shoot, they have a harder time getting the larger amounts of data processed properly. The study found the optimum relationship between CCD and MP comes in at 6 Megapixels.

That’s got to be the reason so many more people are stepping up to Digital SLR. Me? I’m not quite ready, so I picked up the Panasonic FZ-18 instead. It’s $500 list price, but I managed to grab it on sale for $250 at Amazon.com. What a steal!

Check out some of the pictures I’ve been able to grab with it:

ambleside
false creek

Since the FZ18 is kind of a “hybrid” between a DSLR and a point and shoot, it’s offering me the chance to just grab it and take a picture, or work with the settings for something more artistic.

For that sunset shot, I just pointed and clicked. Nice.

The Blog According to Buzz. Spread the word, ya heard?

Like this post? Pass it on...
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
 

Tags: , , , ,

  • Buzz, I have a Nikon Coolpix L3 5.1 megapixels.

    Nice pictures from your camera!!

    Thanks for the info about megapixels.

    Happy New Year,

    Bruce
  • Definitely right about how many megapixels you need -- too many people are falling for the line that they need a 10 megapixel digital camera, and then they're only using the images for their blog or a webpage. For that, you can get away with a TWO megapixel camera, even.

    I've just picked up a new SLR myself, but that's because I love to play around with exposure and focus, and there are very few point and shoot models that make that even halfway possible without pushing a zillion buttons. (And of course I swap lenses regularly for specialty shooting too, so that's another key point for moving to SLR.)
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Buzz Bishop

Dad. Broadcaster. Writer.
New Media Evangelist.

Need more than 6 words? Check out the Media Kit.

Copyright

Creative Commons License
Copyright 2009 cyberbuzz media.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NC-SA 2.5 Canada License.